Theatrical art and clinical medicine. The medical act as a dramatic representation

Abstract

This text explores the similarities between theatrical representation and medical practice. Both fields require a meticulous study of the “characters” to be portrayed or attended to. It also mentions simulation scenarios and standardized patients as examples of the intersection between theater and medicine.

The text highlights Konstantin Stanislavski and his acting method, which emphasizes the integral creation of characters, not just reciting lines. This approach is compared to the work of the physician, who must reconstruct the life story of their patients to understand their current situation. Thus, the physician is seen as a Stanislavskian interpreter of the patient’s character.

The word “drama” is analyzed in its two senses: a literary work intended to be performed and a play with tense actions and conflicting passions. Both apply to the medical act. The analogy between the doctor-patient interaction and theatrical representation suggests that the art of medical acting could be taught using stage techniques.

The art of acting involves credibly portraying a role, which is similar to the work of the physician in convincing the patient to achieve communication, therapeutic adherence, and trust. Emotional intelligence is essential in both fields. According to Cherry, the emotional intelligence of physicians affects outcomes and can be observed in communication.

The text concludes that the theory of acting can be effectively applied to medical education, using techniques such as role-playing and psychodrama. It also highlights the importance of social cognition in medical practice. In summary, the physician, like the actor, must interpret their own role and consider the impression they wish to make on the patient.